Leadership
Written by: Mai B. AlOwaish | CEO of CINET, Kuwait's Credit Bureau
Updated 8:00 AM EDT, July 7, 2026

I’m often asked how I made the transition from Chief Data Officer (CDO) to CEO, and why more CDOs don’t follow the same path.
Looking back, the answer has very little to do with data. The transition wasn’t driven by becoming more technical or gaining another qualification. It came from changing how I viewed leadership, business, and my own role within the organization.
The journey taught me lessons that went far beyond data, and those lessons ultimately shaped my path to becoming CEO.
One of the biggest misconceptions about the CDO role is that it is purely technical. In reality, it is one of the most cross-functional positions in the organization. CDOs work closely with finance, marketing, operations, compliance, and virtually every other function.
Yet many fail to recognize this breadth as one of their greatest leadership advantages.
Unlike many of their C-suite peers, CDOs spend more time working across the organization than within their own function. While CFOs focus on financial performance and CIOs on technology delivery, the CDO enables every part of the business to make better decisions and create value through data.
That requires navigating competing priorities, influencing without direct authority, and translating between technical and business perspectives.
Those are not just data leadership skills; they are CEO skills. The ability to align diverse stakeholders, build consensus, and achieve results through others is at the heart of effective executive leadership.
However, if you present yourself only as a “data person,” that becomes your ceiling. Organizations tend to see you through the lens you create for yourself. Expanding that perception takes intention, consistency, and a willingness to step beyond traditional role boundaries.
Your branding matters a lot. How others in the organization perceive you is critical. It’s not just about your work, but how you talk about it.
Many data leaders unintentionally box themselves in by presenting their achievements in purely technical terms. Don’t do that! Doing that can make you valuable, but only within a narrow lane.
The shift happens when you start framing your work around business impact and change.
There is a big difference between saying you built dashboards… and explaining how those dashboards influenced decisions or saved costs. The latter tells a story that the organizational leadership can connect with.
It shows that you understand the business, not just the tools.
Personal brand, in this context, is really about narrative. It is the consistent way you communicate the value you create. Over time, that narrative shapes how others perceive your role and your potential.
If your story is rooted in transformation and outcomes, you are seen as a leader of change. If it stays rooted in technology, you are seen as a specialist. That distinction often determines whether you are considered for broader leadership roles, including a future CEO opportunity.
As data and AI tools become more accessible, technical skills alone are no longer enough. The real differentiator is your understanding of the business.
Without that grounding, even the most sophisticated analysis can lack direction and fail to drive meaningful outcomes. This is why developing domain expertise is critical. Whether it’s risk, marketing, operations, or customer experience, that context allows you to ask sharper questions and focus on what truly matters.
It shifts your role from reporting insights to shaping decisions.
Over time, this deeper understanding also builds credibility with business leaders. You are no longer seen as someone who provides data on request, but as a partner who understands their challenges and helps solve them. That shift in perception is critical for influence.
The future belongs to those who can combine data fluency with holistic business acumen. That combination positions you not just as a data leader, but also as a strategic voice in the organization.
Many people assume the biggest shift from CDO to CEO is moving from influence to accountability. In reality, influence becomes even more important.
The CEO ultimately owns the decision and its outcomes, but execution still depends on bringing people along with you.
As a CDO, I spent years influencing decisions through data storytelling, business cases, and stakeholder alignment. Those same skills became even more critical as CEO.
Whether presenting an investment case to the board or driving a significant organizational transformation, I am still telling stories, presenting evidence, and building alignment.
I remember one of my first board meetings as CEO, where I was presenting a decision for a major initiative. As I walked out of the meeting, I had an unexpected sense of déjà vu. I realized I had instinctively fallen back on the approach I had relied on for years as a CDO when presenting enterprise initiatives to the management committee.
The skills hadn’t changed; the context had. What carried over was the disciplined preparation, the structured narrative, and the focus on evidence, trade-offs, and business outcomes.
That moment reinforced something important for me: becoming CEO did not require abandoning the strengths I had built as a CDO. It required applying them at a broader enterprise level.
The mindset shift is in developing that broader perspective: when speaking with internal teams, conversations naturally focus on culture, operations, people, and execution. When speaking with the board, discussions focus more on market dynamics, strategic positioning, future direction, risk, and financial performance.
The audience and story change, the responsibility expands, but the underlying skill remains the same.
One of the most important shifts aspiring CEOs should seek is exposure to revenue, cost, and business performance. As a CDO, my focus was naturally on transformation, innovation, capability building, and creating long-term value through data.
Success was often measured through adoption, innovation potential, or strategic impact over time.
As CEO, however, the lens became broader and more integrated. Every initiative had to be evaluated not only on strategic value, but also on financial impact, timing, execution capacity, regulatory implications, operational priorities, and opportunity cost.
I found myself constantly asking: Is this the best use of capital, management attention, and organizational energy at this particular moment?
The conversation changed from “Can we do this?” to “Should we do this now?” That level of trade-off thinking is one of the biggest differences between leading a function and leading an enterprise.
It also changes how people perceive you.
As a CDO, many viewed me as a transformation leader and advocate for innovation. As CEO, I became responsible for balancing growth, profitability, risk, culture, regulators, shareholders, employees, and customers simultaneously. Those broader CEO responsibilities require weighing competing priorities rather than optimizing a single function.
One defining moment came when I decided to stop development on one of our data products. Earlier in my career as CDO, I would have instinctively pushed forward, gathered more feedback, refined the solution, and looked for ways to expand it.
But as CEO, I had to evaluate the broader picture. Financial performance, strategic priorities, regulatory considerations, operational realities, and resource allocation all pointed toward a different decision.
That was the moment I realized I was no longer thinking like a functional leader, but rather as an enterprise leader.
As a CDO, most of your focus is internal. You are improving data quality, driving adoption, and enabling better decision-making within the organization. These are critical responsibilities, but they represent only one part of a much larger picture.
As a CEO, your perspective expands significantly. You are not just looking inward, but also outward. You are thinking about competitors, regulators, customers, and overall market positioning at the same time. The role requires you to constantly balance internal priorities with external realities.
This shift can feel overwhelming at first, especially as the scope broadens and the stakes become higher. You are expected to make decisions with incomplete information while staying aligned with long-term strategy and short-term pressures.
However, your experience working across functions as a CDO gives you a strong foundation to build on. You are already used to connecting different parts of the business and understanding how decisions in one area impact another.
That ability to see the bigger picture becomes even more valuable as your role expands.
One of the biggest differences I experienced as a CEO was the diversity of teams. As a CDO, you’re leading team members who share similar technical backgrounds. As a CEO, you lead people with very different mindsets and priorities.
Creating alignment in that environment requires a strong cultural foundation. People need a shared understanding of what the organization stands for and where it is going. Without that, execution becomes fragmented.
Communication plays a key role here, but it is not just about formal messaging. It is about consistent signals across the organization that reinforce priorities and behaviors. Over time, those signals shape how people work together.
One risk for data leaders moving into executive roles is over-relying on numbers. It is easy to default to dashboards and reports because that is what you are trained to trust.
At the same time, as CEO, you are also naturally farther removed from day-to-day operations, meaning conversations with customers, employees, and partners become less frequent.
It is important to remember that not everything that matters can be captured in data. Direct conversations often reveal insights, context, and emerging issues that no dashboard can provide. Without that perspective, even the most comprehensive reports can leave you with blind spots.
When I was a CDO, I made it a habit to spend time with the people closest to the data, those entering it, preparing reports, and working with it every day. They often surfaced pain points, workarounds, and opportunities that never appeared on a dashboard.
Those conversations frequently explained why the numbers looked the way they did.
As CEO, I have kept that habit, but my focus has shifted. I have informal conversations with team members at different levels across the organization to hear their perspective on our operations, customer experience, and opportunities for improvement.
I often describe these conversations as “reverse mentoring” for leaders because they help keep my perspective fresh and grounded. I also make sure I join selected customer meetings, not to lead the discussion, but simply to hear client sentiment firsthand.
Balancing data with direct human input is essential. It ensures that decisions are grounded in both evidence and context.
The path from CDO to CEO is not about reinventing yourself. It is about expanding your scope and reframing your strengths. You already know how to drive change, align stakeholders, and tell compelling stories with data. The opportunity lies in applying those skills at a broader level.
Each of these shifts may seem small on its own. Together, they change how others perceive you and how you operate within the organization. They accelerate CEO progress and increase the likelihood of being considered for broader leadership opportunities.
Looking ahead, the case for CDOs becoming CEOs will only become stronger. As data and AI reshape every industry, every business model, and every function, organizations need leaders who can turn information into strategy and technology into business value.
The next generation of CEOs won’t just be data-informed; they’ll need to be data-native, regardless of the industry.
If you start thinking like a CEO while you are still a CDO, the transition becomes much less of a leap. It becomes the natural next step in your leadership journey.